For almost a year now I've been carrying around a cache - sandwich size Lock and Lock™ with logbook and swag. I've been looking for a good spot to hide it locally. A nice forest with good trails or an attractive spot somewhere.
3 times I've tried to submit, each time I've been turned down. Once because I was about 10m too close to a 5-year-old old cache. I forgot that I had it on my ignore list because it was a bring-a-ladder cache and required some strength to retrieve the cache. I went back to try to find another good largish hiding spot not too far from the trail but I just couldn't find anything I liked.
The next attempt about a month ago was about 20m too close to a 2-year-old rock pile hide with a number of DNFs and NMs. I found it 2 years ago. The coords are way off (I had posted better coords but the CO didn't update them). For the last 2 years people have been leaving miffed comments about the coordinates and the rock pile problems. I contacted the reviewer hoping they would intervene and alert the owner that if they didn't want to maintain the cache there was someone interested in hiding a cache nearby. But the reviewer asked me to post an NA before s/he would proceed. In my experience active but slack owners do not take kindly to NAs.
This week I couldn't believe how fortunate I was to find a new section of a local trail. Freshly blazed and no caches. I found a decent spot under a stump. Submitted the cache. Waited and 3 days later I get a friendly but disheartening email from the reviewer. Someone has put placeholders on this new trail. I may not be able to post my cache. He will contact the placeholder. I must wait for a remote chance that the spot may open up. Sigh.
This has never happened to me before. We've been planting/posting caches on geocaching.com since 2002 (over 40 cache hides) and have never been stymied.
The cache also contains a
Munzee. I could undeploy and redeploy elsewhere but this is the 3rd time I've undeployed and redeployed it. So yesterday I decided I would post the cache anyway, on Garmin's
OpenCaching site. This is a huge leap for me. I considered posting on opencaching.us too but they discourage cross-posting. I'll see how the Garmin site goes. I don't expect many visits maybe a couple if the Munzeers are also cachers who don't care which site a cache is posted on. If I get lucky and the placeholder relinquishes the location I'll also have it posted on gc.com but for now it's my first cache listing on another cache site.
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
Update:
"I must wait for a remote chance that the spot may open up. Sigh."
The trail opened up! I ended up planting 2 along the trail and have received some very favourable comments. :)
I tried submitting the cache to opencaching.com but I think because this was my first posted cache on OC, my submission was scrutinized carefully and the reviewer thought my coordinates were off. They are fine. I used a Garmin 62s to get the lat/long and averaged until I got a 100% rating. I decided not to post it on OC.com.
I went back to the first forest where I was too close to an old 5 year old cache. I was going to plant a letterbox in that spot but only post it on AQ. Well I couldn't find the log. Too much vegetation covering the area in the springtime. I looked for another spot and found a decent hollow base of a tree. Sometimes visiting at different times of the year gives one a fresh perspective. And, it turns out this spot is far enough away from any geocache in that forest. It's been 5 years since the 2 older caches were placed so it'll give people who visited years ago another reason to go treasure hunting in this quiet old-growth forest.